Reinventing the Life of a Poet in the Modern World

Month: September 2012

Are You a Joiner?

ClubAre you a joiner? Are you a member of prestigious (or even lowbrow) organizations because you like to engage in structured social activities? Somehow I doubt it…because you're a poet. For you networking is probably painful and you stick to your small, solid cliques.

I myself tend to be somewhat of a hermit, although I have had a very love-hate relationship with thematic clubs over the years. I always want to join but then never enjoy having joined.

It all started when I was 7 years old and had consumed every bit of text on the back of my Cher album Cherished (Warner Bros., 1977). There I read about the Cher fan club. A sense of belonging…finally? The promise of a community? Nah, who needs it! I wanted the official pin, the official fan club wallet card, the official welcome letter and all the official political-esque paraphernalia involveCherfanclubd in membersip to such an esteemed organization as Cher's friends.

I filled out the pink form and begged my mother to send in the required $5 entry fee. If she ever did, no welcome packet ever arrived. I was haunted by this over the years and eventually had to buy the original old fan club kit for $40 on eBay decades later (the very cool poster to the left came with it). No Cher fan club since has stayed in business. Their materials tend to be lame and plagued with grammatical errors.

BarryclubSo I switched over to the very nerdy Barry Manilow fan club in my tweens. Finally, the wallet card, the secret newsletter, the secret merchandise catalog! I wrote about my ten-year experience with this club in the webzine Ape Culture ("I Was a Teenage Barry Manilow Fan"). From the BMIFC (Barry Manilow International Fanclub) I learned that someday I wanted to grow up and attend conventions. Think tanks! Name badges! Seminars! Hotel trysts!  This secret dream would lead to some frustrating experiences as a staff member of the Cher Convention (from 2000-2008) where I worked as games coordinator, registrar and sometime MC. 

This year I decided to make an effort to connect with poets beyond my old Sarah Lawrence clique (we used to meet every week in Bronxville back in the 1990s). I decided to start with a subscription to Poetry Flash (the LA poetry newsletter). I paid $12 almost a year ago and have yet to receive anything. They have also ignored six emails and Facebook inquiries about my missing issues and advertising opportunities.  Rip. Off.

Last week I bit the bullet and joined the two big poetry societies. Academy of American Poets costs $35 for a basic membership and all I got was a green membership card with the following May Swenson quote on the back: "Poetry is not philosophy; poetry makes things be, right now." That well-placed semi-colon is worth part of the price of membership.  Someday I should also receive my two issues of American Poet and my National Poetry Month poster. I also get discounts to the online store of books and recordings and discounts to New York events and readings.

I joined the Science Fiction Poetry Association as well because my first book of poems is a tad science-fictiony. I have no idea what my $25 membership will provide in terms of swag. Fingers crossed.

PsaBut it will be hard to beat the welcome I got with Poetry Society of America. When I lived in New York City, it was the PSA outreach that I loved the best, including Poetry in Motion (poetry posters in the subway trains). I have my very own train poster. With my $45 membership I get a lot: a letter on card stock with a membership card, a bookmark, a purple pin that says "Poetry/I, too, like it," a packet of four very colorful poems on postcards and 20% off one of five poetry journals (APR, The Believer, Boston Review, Fence and Washington Square Review…I'm going to pick APR/American Poetry Review).

Let the socializing begin.

Should I keep my membership cards in my wallet? In case I get hit by a bus, people should know I support the arts, right? People should know I'm a poet and therefore somewhat of a loner and this plethora of poetry-club-memberships entitles me to immediate friendships with any poet-EMTs.

Making Fun of Celebrity Poems

JewelIn graduate school it was one of our more sinister pastimes to mock celebrity poems. Part envy, part smug critique, it all started with folk singer Jewel when she published A Night without Armor in 1998. Here's a sample:

I Miss Your Touch

I miss your touch
all taciturn
like the slow migration of birds
nesting momentarily
upon my breast
then lifting
silver and quick–
sabotaging the landscape
with their absence

my skin silent without
their song
a thirsty pool of patient flesh

She gets the juicy word taciturn in there but then leaves it alone to defend itself against the word all. Amazingly, people are still making fun of Jewel poems these many years later…like this piece from Funny or Die: Was This Poem Written by Jewel or Charles Manson: http://www.funnyordie.com/articles/3e2e0d2765/was-this-poem-written-by-jewel-or-charles-manson?playlist=featured_pictures_and_words

BeauTo be honest, I never read her entire book. But that didn't stop me from buying Beau Sia's spoof in 1998,  A Night Without Armor II. It's well-maintained inanity. Some examples:

love poem

I want
you
now.

do not think
about this.

we are in love.

if we die
tonight,
we
might as well
be having
the greatest sex
of our lives.

with each other of course.

I don't suppose raindrops

only one girl I kissed
did not love the rain

they were all still crazy
though.

that's why
poems about the rain
work so well
on a woman's thighs.

we all aspire to learn
more
about clouds.

TouchmeAfter Sia's book, I sought out celebrity poetry. I waited a long time for the score of getting Suzanne  Somers' 1974 book Touch Me off eBay. The book has no table of contents or even page numbers and there are 23 poems broken across 4 or 5 sections.  Every other poem is also facing a black and white, soft-focus photo of Somers looking peaceful or contemplative. Poems are titled "Organic Girl" and "Houseplants" and "Last Night it Was Right." Some examples:

Lies

I have lied to you
    A thousand times
Reshaped the truth
     To keep you close
     And avoid hurting you.
But I always lied with words.

Last night I lied to you
    In silence
    With my hands, my mouth, my caress
The worst lie of all.
    And now I know something is over.
    Because before
I only lied with words.

No!

I don't give you time
    Because you're a cliche
    I meet a thousand times a day.
There's no need to talk.
    I know you're handsome
    And successful
    And extremely good in bed.
But really there's nothing to say,
Only a kind of game to play.
    Only a tedious cliche
    I meet a thousand times a day.
And I always forget your name.

 


StewartOuch!

The absolute worst was in Jimmy Stewart's book, Jimmy Stewart and His Poems from 1989. I found this at a garage sale and couldn't resist the self-satisfied stare of Stewart from the book cover. It's a mere four poems covering 31 pages, each poem prefaced with long passages explaining the context of each poem. Indulgent much? Some examples:

from The Aberdares!

The North Pole's rather chilly.
Those who've been there all will tell
There's lots of snow and lots of ice
And lots of wind as well.

An iceberg's really never warm
And takes a while to melt.
A snowball's not the hottest thing
That I have ever felt.

from I'm a Movie Camera

I'm a movie camera. Instamatic is my name.
I'm Eastman's latest model,
   Super 8's my claim to fame.
I was on a shelf in Westwood
   when an actor purchased me
And took me home to 918 in Hills the Beverly.

from Beau

He never came to me when I would call
Unless I had a tennis ball,
Or he felt like it,
But mostly he didn't come at all…

Discipline was not his bag
But when you were with him things sure didn't drag.
He'd dig up a rosebush just to spite me,
And when I'd grab him, he'd turn to bite me.

Bite me indeed.

I know what you're thinking and no: there is no indication on the cover or inside that these were written for children.

But I'm done goofing on bad poetry. I've decided it's a psychological sink hole. You feel superior for a little while but then you end up feeling inferior deep down where you don't want to admit it. Who am I to begrudge another person's poetic journey? Snob it up at your own risk, I say. You might be reincarnated as someone who dresses up in kabuki makeup and writes such things as "Lick it up."

Besides, there are amazing celebrity "poems" out there. Many poets were once transformed by Bob Dylan or now Lucinda Williams.  Joni Mitchell changed the way I write. "The Last Time I Saw Richard" is one of the few "poems" I've ever memorized. And Leonard Cohen…wow. What these writers can do is make up for a lot of dreck in the world, some of it most likely mine in all those petty previous lives.

Moment of Craft Fridays: Poetry & Horror

KingAt poetry writing conventions and conferences, you can easily call out the poetry snobs right away because they will consistently provide disparaging comments about either Stephen King or Billy Collins if one of their names is somehow brokered into the conversation.

They are discerning after all. They would never read Stephen King.

But I am a fan of pop culture (as well as a student and a victim of it) and I prefer the company of other pop culture gutter rats.

Although I wouldn't say I'm a fan of Stephen King. I have grown tired of movies based on his books, his style as a columnist can be off-putting in a Dave Barry kind of way (and yes I saw their band once, The Rock Bottom Remainders, at the Los Angeles Book Festival) and I once had the misfortune of reading the first pages of his wife's somewhat awful novel galleys when I was an intern at Penguin in New York City.

That said, I have read three or four King novels and have appreciated them (Skeleton Crew, The Stand, Pet Cemetery, Carrie and, best of them all, The Shining) and after seeing King read in St. Louis on his Insomnia tour I found myself with a signed copy of his book that I carried around for ten years before selling it for $130 a few months ago on eBay. 

King has written two books on his craft (On Writing and Dance Macabre) and I've read and learned things from them both. And I loved The Shining. I loved how he weaved elements from one chapter into major events of the next. I felt that book had real craft about it.

As I feel the presentation of horror has ultimate craft about it: the chilling level of aggression, writing that sinks into your bone marrow, the genre itself a representation of poetic form. The same demands are made: how will the artist break out from this form's structure? What thrilling things can you find in the text and subtext? In your own scary unconscious imagination?

It takes balls to write scary. And sometimes I wonder if poets are ultimately intimidated by it.

From Dance Macabre:

"One of the things that makes art a force to be reckoned with even by those who don't care for it is the regularity with which myth swallows truth…and without so much as a burp of indigestion."

Isn't this the eternal dilemma of Truth or Beauty? Which is again why I love a good ghost story. If it's true, far out. But if it's a lie, well then I love how a well-placed lie can contain the truth. And a truth not usually found from the text, but in the vulnerable mind of the reader.

Reviewing my scribbles in Dance Macabre, I found where King quotes the poet Kenneth Patchen:

Come now,
my child,
if we were planning
to harm you, do you think
we'd be lurking here
beside the path
in the very dark-
ness part of
the forest?

Okay, I'm not so sure about those line breaks but I'm intrigued by the short scare, enough that I just ordered Patchen's Collected Poems. Reading his bio on Amazon…

Kenneth Patchen, 1911-1972, was born in Ohio, fought in WWII, and spent the rest of his life invalided by spinal disease. His was a powerful, angry voice that could sing some of the most beautiful love poems of the past century. He moved easily among the San Francisco poets, a contemporary of Lawrence Ferlinghetti of the famed City Lights Book Store. 

…highlights how exciting it is when anger and pain really go for the jugular. It's scary to read. I admit that it's not always peaceful and illuminating. But when you experience it, you feel like you're living in a more present way. You're breathing in a more active way, the way that allows you to notice your own living and breathing.

Sort of like shock-Zen.

I dissed King's wife Tabitha earlier but she's a crucial figure in the world of horror fiction. In On Writing, King writes:

Someone once wrote that all novels are really letters aimed at one person. As it happens, I believe this. I think that every novelist has a single ideal reader; that at various points during the composition of the story, the writer is thinking, "I wonder what he/she will think when he/she reads this part. For me that reader is my wife, Tabitha.

250px-AHS_season_2So without Tabitha we probably would not have gone through the thrilling horror of The Shining and we know for sure we wouldn't have read Carrie because Tabitha dug it out of their trash can. Can you imagine a world without these popular melodramas of high school, marriage, neighborhood communities and all their entourage of fears?

Imaging all the crazy inane things that scare Americans? Without Stephen King would we have ever seen the likes of the brilliant F/X show American Horror Story? Don't get me started on those Jessica Lange performances.

For my dollar, I like poetry that shoves me back into the corner of my couch with an afghan pulled over my head.

But maybe that's just me.

Jim Carroll

CarrollI don't know whose idea it was to go see Jim Carroll read in Manhattan in the last 1990s. My friends Julie and Christopher from Sarah Lawrence were usually on top of the trendy readings in the city and I would tag along, very much a newbie about famous and trendy writers.

I do remember we were near St. Marks and we also saw Lou Reed and Laurie Anderson read that night. I was hooked by Jim Carroll's poems right off. I bought his selected anthology, Fear of Dreaming, and later the book Void of Course.

Jim was already famous for The Basketball Diaries, probably this is what tempted my friends to want to see him read if Lou Reed wasn't a big enough draw. I didn't like Lou Reed's work at all. Maybe Carroll benefited in comparison. However, I still feel Carroll is the best poet at describing Manhattan, the tone of the city as I experienced in the late 1990s.

From "Heroin"

so beside me
a light bulb is revolving
wall to wall,
a reminder of the great sun
which had otherwise completely collapsed
down to the sore toe of the white universe.

From "Poem"

We are very much a part of the boredom
of early Spring of planning the days shopping
of riding down Fifth on a bus terrified by easter.

From "Chelsea May"

I conceal so much
moving in and out poetry
I could have simply left a note

There are many prose poems from The Book of Nods that I loved, including "Trained Monkey," "Homage to Gerald Manly Hopkins," "Zero's Final Paradox," "Silent Monkey" and "The Buddha Reveals Himself." And I love this poem, "Post-Modernism"

I gather up the giant holes.
Why should I bother with the rock
and sand which fills them?

Why should I bother with distracting weights.
Without elegance, or allow myself to be taken
hostage, leaving only through back doors,
a gun raised to the pulse of my lucid shadow?

Read his obituary in the New York Times.

Monday Poetry News Roundup

I've been gone for quite a few of the last Mondays. Here is a catch-up of some good stuff:

Moment of Craft Fridays: Avoid Self-Deceptions

Dec

In his 1997 book, Best Words, Best Order, Stephen Dobyns begins with a chapter called Deception where he states:

"the writer must give up all theories and be a complete pragmatist. He or she must ask constantly: What am I trying to do? He or she must measure the words against intention and demand how each word, sentence or image contributes to the whole."

However, self-deception is the most powerful and insidious kind and many writers don't have the psychological strength to meet their own deceptions head on. In fact, for many writers, their writing is just another self-deceptive coping mechanism. Why would they want to change that?

Writer/psychotherapist Charles Harper Webb talks about psychological blocks in the October/November 2011 issue of The Writer's Chronicle that I picked up in a waiting room where I'm working at IAIA.

Webb says to succeed a writer must "approve of expressing personal power and powerful emotions…must lower his psychological defenses…cast off modesty and deference….[and] be willing to be harshly criticized." He says this is the "price of power." I think he means poetic power.

He also lists possible "power sources" of a healthy poem:

  1. Effective technique
  2. Authenticity
  3. Religious/spiritual overtones
  4. Seriousness (with room for humor)
  5. Good stories dramatically told
  6. Cinematic action-writing
  7. Willingness to tackle big themes
  8. Explosive metaphors and imagery
  9. Truth-telling/insight
  10. Compassion
  11. Vulnerability
  12. Healthy sexuality
  13. Accessibility

I'm sure many experimental poets would take issue with many of these (including #13 but possibly #10 too).

What power sources are crucial for you? What self-deceptions hold you back?

Poet on Wire

MowSo sometimes it’s good to step outside of your art form, see what other impassioned artists are doing what keeps them going, and how they articulate their ideas of beauty.

Current TV last summer aired a list of 50 documentaries you should see before you die. My two Sarah Lawrence compatriots, Julie and Christopher, got me hooked on documentaries back in the 1990s. So I had seen a big chunk of the 50 on the list. But I made note of about 12 more I should see. Netflix just sent me Man on Wire, the documentary about frenchman Philippe Petit who walked a tightrope back and forth eight times between the top of the World Trade Center towers back in 1974.

The documentary was made in 2008 and lovingly describes the building of the World Trade Center towers without mentioning their demise on September 11, 2001. This gives the subject understated melancholy.

Petit was obsessed with walking across the highest landmarks without a net. A tightrope walker with great technical skill, physical strength and beauty, sometimes you forget you’re looking at a man on a wire and believe he's walking out into the open thin air…like something in a Dali or Magritte picture. Petit’s ballet performances also detracts from the fact that he has huge cajones to perform these walks illegally and without a net, risking his life every time.

Pulling off the tightrope performance in 1974 was tantamount to a bank heist. Planners and schemers were involved from France, America and Australia (one working inside the towers) and the movie recreates all the strategy sessions required to figure out crucial details like how to get a wire from the top of one tower to the other.

One thing that frustrated me about the recent documentary on Rumi was how blow-hardy the experts were when pontificating about Rumi’s motivations and inspirations. Petit is a marvelous contrast to this. His is articulate and deliberate, shows pure enthusiasm without being obtuse and excluding; and although you can see he’s pretty full of himself, he still connects with you (artist to artist) as he declares who he is and why he must walk the rope.

As soon as he was arrested after his 1974 tower walk. New York City reporters descended on him, wanting to know why, why, why he did it?

So American, Petit said. There is no why. He did it because it was beautiful.

© 2024 Big Bang Poetry

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑